tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-83056854867599838102011-08-08T08:53:50.417-07:00IUSTITIA ENIM DEI IN EO REVELATUR ED FIDE IN FIDEM SICUT SCRIPTUM EST IUSTUS AUTEM EX FIDE VIVITTommy Ferrarahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05010162348002937723noreply@blogger.comBlogger21100tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8305685486759983810.post-22825340899619759082008-07-12T21:33:00.000-07:002008-07-20T02:07:01.320-07:00

I was just glancing over the titles on my bookshelves and noticed a common theme among many of them: evidences for the faith, logical arguments for belief, rational reasons for God, etc., and I thought who does this profit primarily? I've always thought that evidential apologetics was for the unbelieving seeker. Now while this is somewhat true, I think the full impact finds itself inside the

Tommy Ferrarahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05010162348002937723noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8305685486759983810.post-87346995081938625312008-07-09T19:44:00.000-07:002008-07-11T13:24:06.843-07:00

Why is it that theology and doctrine have taken a back seat in the priority of the Church today? Doctrine mattered to those who came before us; the Puritans, the Reformers, the Early Church Fathers, even the Apostles. Many died as martyrs for the faith because of some theological stance, or doctrinal position. Why is it so neglected and even shameful in so many churches? I've become very critical

Tommy Ferrarahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05010162348002937723noreply@blogger.com0